- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Kepler Kessel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Being one of the oldest student newspapers in Germany sounds like a claim to notability, but a search reveals very little coverage in independent sources. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- A Gymnasium (Germany) is equivalent to a high school in the United States. The long history indicates there may be something, but I'm not too confident we'll be able to find it, especially since de:Kepler Kessel doesn't really offer us anything. If we don't, per WP:STUDENTMEDIA, the page should be redirected to the institution it serves, so we should create a stub for the high school based off of de:Kepler-Gymnasium Ulm and point it there. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 11:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Agree with Cordless Larry (talk · contribs). Honestly, being one of the oldest student newspapers sounds really cool - but I couldn't find any secondary sources to verify the claim or pass the article through WP:GNG. Shame :(OfficerCow (talk) 11:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would have said redirect to the gymnasium (since redirects are cheap), but the gymnasium doesn't have an article. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 03:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.