The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kentucky Christian School Athletic Association[edit]

Doesn't assert notability, and may not meet WP:CORP from what I can see. Comments? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 05:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 05:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete no claim of notability. --Victor falk 16:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Most states with a large number of "Christian schools" have an athletic association that operates independently of the regular state high school athletic association. There are a variety of reasons for these; in some cases, the private schools can't arrange to play against public schools because of school board politics, and the schools end up scheduling against each other. I note that Ohio, Louisiana, Missouri and North Carolina have similar associations. Granted, the winner of the state Christian school basketball tournament doesn't have the same notability as the winner of ths state high school championship, but within the world of "Christian education", organizations like the KCSAA are quite notable. Athletic competition is often a make-or-break feature for keeping enrollment up for that type of school. Mandsford 22:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Slow keep per Mandsford, multiple claims of notability have been made to support the article. Burntsauce 17:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article makes specific claims of notability, and such state athletic associations have a strong precedent for notability. NOTE: The AfD does NOT appear on the article in question. Alansohn 04:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems notable but needs more work and references. --Kudret abi^Talk 06:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-nominate The AfD notice was never placed on the article, and as such this AfD should be re-nominated as a procedural nomination. Pablo Talk | Contributions 07:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.