The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Mellor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Can verify he is the writer of books, but there is no significant coverage of him. CNMall41 (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreferenced BLP for over 12 years. Possible promotional. No coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 09:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While lack of references is not a reason to delete (it is a reason to find RS and expand the article), searching Newsbank database I found 7 articles mentioning Mellor from 2000-2004, mostly in Sunday newspapers. None of these are sufficiently substantial to reach reliable source status in my view. Fails WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.