The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katbite[edit]

Katbite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable band, no references from reliable third parties. Only news link appears to be from single editor website. Tagged for notability since January 2007, and prodded, with no improvement. Very few edits to article ever. - Optigan13 07:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: NN and no improvement after a great length of time. - Rjd0060 07:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Despite claims of international touring (a WP:BAND criterion), I don't see much substantial here. Pigman^what?/trail 17:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom Paul20070 23:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if they have toured internationally, I would expect to see evidence of it: some internationl write-ups of thier gigs in NZ, and other countries.Garrie 02:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This band doesn't make it in importance and seems non notable. --Stormbay 16:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.