The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more specific in your deletion reason. It doesn't have to pass WP:NACTOR and hence can be kept. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Appears to be just another temple with nothing to distinguish it; there is no assertion of how it is notable. Mangoe (talk) 02:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.