The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G4. Randykitty (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kanishk Sajnani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was deleted last year via AfD so I'm not sure if G4 applies. So lets revisit it. A quick G'search produce some appropriate number of coverage in the independent RS about the person but I feel most of the coverage so far is still due a single event. The article was created by a SPA so I feel there is still some COI issue. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanghvi6722 Saqib (talk) 09:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I didn't knew about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanishk Sajnani (2nd nomination). That one is recent so I think G4 is perfect now. Let's close it speedy. GSS beat me to the punch with Speedy tags. I suggest page be salted when deleted. --Saqib (talk) 09:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: A possible case of UPE and G5 too. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.