The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kamalanayani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had prodded the article with the reasoning that there are no reliable sources that confirm the claim of the subject being the daughter of Hindu God Krishna. The prod was removed with a bevy of sources provided. I have checked all the sources, including the offline one which coincidentally was available in my university library. There is no such name connected with the god Krishna in the sources provided. Irrespective, the subject fails GNG and does not qualify for SNG. In case sources confirming existence of the subject and relation to Krishna are found, I propose a redirect to Krishna. Otherwise, as the current situation is, deleting this seems to be in order. Lourdes 18:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first source in the article is pointing to a Wikipedia article so it does not meet WP:RS. I searched the sencond and fourth and they do not include the name Kamalanayani. Since Lourdes also checked the ofline version, we either have a hoax or a BLP without references. in any case it should be deleted. --Rogerx2 (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable character from the Mahabharata? Not quite sure she is a character there. Cannot source. Purported fictional character. Not BLP. Dlohcierekim 00:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.