The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you want to take it to Wiktionary, just ask. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kalkharab[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this is a dictionary definition Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDICT. The article gives only a dictionary definition and some use examples, which amount to a dictionary entry. It does not discuss a concept or an entity. --Muhandes (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTDICT clearly states that. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDICT. Nothing to add to the others' comments, really. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 08:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Its a dictionary word but has a deep history associated with its origin. I am unable to find Online References; but this word is widely. I am working out on the etymology of this word. --Devkoy (talk) 12:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: Frqns001 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Muhandes (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.