The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julie (given name)[edit]

My vote is Keep, but I think this discussion needs to continue here. For reasoning and pertinent information regarding this issue see: Talk:Julie (given name) - HammerHeadHuman ^(talk)(work) 21:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete and redirect to wiktionary [1]. All the info in this article is actually a definitionAbtract 22:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ... OK I am convinced. Abtract 07:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep, names are not ordinary words and there could possibly be more that can be done with this (history of the name for example). Nardman1 00:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Statistics aren't definitions. while 'Otherstuffexists' is NOT an acceptable argument, the presence of large quantities of other articles of a similar nature with varying levels of statistics, histories and so on suggests that there's more content than wiktionary should be responsible for, thus defaulting back to WP. ThuranX 02:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in all fairness, the statistics were added after the article was tagged for deletion (and after Abtract voted). - HammerHeadHuman ^(talk)(work) 02:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions (popularity statistics, impact of literature, name day celebrations) have demonstrated how an article about a given name can be more than simply a wiktionary definition. Keep. --Paul Erik 02:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per ThuranX. (Has nothing to do with one of my best friends being named Julie. Nothing at all. ^_^) JuJube 09:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Many given names have their own pages, and are quite notable in the own respect. Someguy1221 22:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.