The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Very weak delete As part of the JJIF it seems like this relatively new organization should be notable, but I couldn't find independent sources when I searched the web. It should at least be worth a mention in the JJIF article. Astudent0 (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I found no independent and reliable sources that support notability. The fact that it's a new sub-branch of the JJIF confers no notability (which is not inherited). Papaursa (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.