The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Article was PRODed as not notable, and template removed before expiry. Majority of references are not reliable sources. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No independent sources as far as I can see. Seems like an advert. Some good sources and I'd change my mind, but delete as it stands DRosin (talk) 22:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.