The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Fenix down (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Daniels[edit]

Josh Daniels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage, just local coverage, mainly about his family tragedy) and WP:NFOOTBALL (has only played in semi-pro Irish leagues). Can be restored if/when he makes his professional debut. GiantSnowman 09:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is already a pre-existing draft which pre-dates the mainspace article - User:GiantSnowman/Josh Daniels. GiantSnowman 11:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This one seems a like it has a bit more, however shouldn't you perform a speedy WP:CSD#A10 then? Govvy (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please find me some stuff which isn't a) routine transfer news and/or b) from the local paper... GiantSnowman 10:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Belfast Telegraph article is neither routine nor local. Not that there's anything wrong with local - and the Shropshire Star piece is significant and in-depth. I think you are splitting hairs on this one. Nfitz (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, the BT piece is decent. On its own - not enough IMHO. GiantSnowman 11:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm suspicious of this IP editor ... their only other two edits (the same day), was to call someone a whore, and falsely report someone else as dead. Can someone look into? Nfitz (talk) 01:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Nfitz: The IP has only made 9 edits, and some dubious ones at that. I don't really think their vote should count. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Despite User:GiantSnowman's comments above, I'm find a lot of decent coverage before their transfer to England, and I've added 3 more good references to the article. Can you look again User:Spiderone - and what's with the vandalizing IP editor's vote above? Nfitz (talk) 01:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked them and they seem like fairly routine local newspaper pieces. I'm still leaning towards delete here Spiderone 11:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm not really seeing GNG here either, a lot of the sources are either local or routine transfer talk, but some have been added recently, so no harm in extending for another week for further disucssion, but unless more keep votes come in, I would close as delete with the discussion in its current state.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to allow discussion of recently proffered sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.