The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Casamassima[edit]

Joseph Casamassima (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable person. I'm not really sure what the claim to notability is. Mostly seems to be about his musical endeavors, but does not pass WP:MUSIC; appears to fail WP:BIO as well. Mostly edited by a series of single-purpose accounts. TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No hits in [1] news archive, no material claims of notability. Bongomatic 13:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I sorted out the long list of references and it appears that his sole claim to notability is his cross-country walk for MS in 2007. It did get limited local media coverage but nothing substantial enough to pass notability. TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I've walked to raise money, everyone in more than one of my classes at school walked to raise money, we have also read books to raise money. None of that made us notable. It didn't make anyone else notable. that blp1e thing appears to apply here. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non notable, one event. Deletion Mutation 16:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC) N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked user struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked, not banned, which does not mean an automatic revert of all edits. Since the sockpuppet was not being used to game this AFD, his !vote should not be discounted. TheJazzDalek (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Very weak keep - there are multiple, good sources already in the stub. This might be rescued. Bearian (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.