The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Goldman data scientist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be only notable for being the subject of a HBR article, otherwise nothing notable here. Is HBR enough on its own to pass GNG? Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also headed data science for LinkedIn and now intuit. Notable enough for intuit to acquire his company just to hire him. See other sources 106.215.171.147 (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)iwannacrib[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One article alone, even if it's fairly in depth, is not enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The WSJ article has a trivial mention of him, but isn't about him. From searching I've turned up a couple of other trivial mentions where he gives some quotes about topics, but that isn't coverage of him. Not enough to meet the notability guidelines. FuriouslySerene (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No signs of a better solid notable article. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NO Delete Added link to book[1] Plus existing links to Venturebeat, HBR and WSJ mention him as notable data scientist.Iwannacrib (talk) 06:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wanted to save this, but the sources just aren't there. I moved the article to the correctly formatted name, so closing editor should make sure to delete both Jonathan Goldman data scientist and Jonathan Goldman (data scientist) as well as removing the hatnote from Jonathan Goldman.--Jahaza (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.