The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jclemens (talk) 03:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johnnyboyxo[edit]

Johnnyboyxo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

None of the sources currently on the article pass WP:RS, and the article was previously deleted for what I assume to be similar reasons; fails WP:BIO, with no reliable sources to be seen. (Alt. search: 1) Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--DrewMaverick (talk) 10:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC) I think that www.gawker.com is a reliable source it is a heavily visited website and is a reliable gossip website on scale of Perez Hilton.. speaking of perez hilton, he also posted about Johnny http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-06-avril-lavigne-is-blogging-again. He is a Youtube celebrity and is the number 82 most subscribed Guru on the whole YouTube website, with video views over 31 million. Think about that and then say he's not qualified for the article.[reply]

Also, he has 5 singles out on itunes and amazon, most of which have charted on various iTunes charts including the electronic chart. I don't know what else to tell you.. he has over 80,000 myspace friends... 10,000,000 music plays on myspace... I completely disagree with your decision to nominate this for deletion.


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.