The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Sparkz[edit]

John Sparkz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD was declined. No evidence I could find that the producer passes any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. As for WP:GNG, he most certainly fails. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Link to magazine published is Here Another link to a release of project with a mainstream media outlet can be found here JohnMor92 —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you have any evidence Forever Madness: The Randy Savage EP is notable? Your source attests its existence. Anyone can have an EP. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't see a meaningful claim of notability, nor do I see any reliable and verifiable sources that would establish such a claim. Alansohn (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete I clearly see reliable and verifiable recourses of working with professional musicians just like every other engineer on here. User:JohnMor92 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Would you care to present your clearly "reliable and verifiable recourses"? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A list of music industry credits can be found here And Forever Madness: The Randy Savage EP's editorial release via a major News/Entertainment outlet can be found here. User:JohnMor92 (talk) 19 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.106.35 (talk)

That link merely states that "a collaborative EP" was released. Do you have evidence the EP is notable? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree, though not as well recognized by the normal person, if you check the sources he is all over the hip hop industry with a lot of well known work.2601:81:8400:100:6233:4BFF:FE1B:9F57 (talk) 19:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If I "check the sources he is all over the hip hop industry"? What sources? All over what? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, have added some projects to the article talkpage so relevant editors are notified. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, JohnMor92, are you John Sparkz? its just that your user name is similar to his birthname - John Moriau, with his birthyear - 1992, tacked on, please look at WP:AUTO, and WP:USERNAME, thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No evidence of notability in the article's sources and brief online search. Aust331 (talk) 08:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable music engineer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and I would have PRODed instead. SwisterTwister talk 02:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing of note and a clear conflict of interest from the only person arguing to keep. Can probably be snow closed, actually. KaisaL (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG, a gsearch has brought up nothing useable, in the article's external links there is an interview from Jenesis Magazine[1], but there needs to be more for notability. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.