John Lincoln (telecommunications)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece for a non-notable corporate executive. In view of the author's other articles it looks like a paid piece to me. Author's SPI for (;;) (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. clearly promotional paid bio by an now banned obvious paid sock editor, responsible for dozens of equally non notable articles on corporate executives. No real notability in any even--the accomplishments are of no interest outside the company . Notability is claimed as the author of a book, but it turns out the book is self-published through Author House. I hope whoever paid for this gets their money back, because adding such a book doesn't show basic competence. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. If the speedy hadn't been denied, that would have worked too: it's promotional. Drmies (talk) 02:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This article is notable as it has received significant coverage in multiple published as per GNG.43.241.117.193 (talk)