The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Paradise[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cleanly, this article has only one source, and this flash cartoon is not notable. JJ98 (Talk) 23:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cannot find any sources that would demonstrate the notability of this flash cartoon. Reyk _YO! 09:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, borderline spam ╟─Treasury Tag►person of reasonable firmness─╢ 10:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Looks like advertisment / promotional article. Starionwolf (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.