The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Michael Hansen[edit]

Jim Michael Hansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author, no biographical sources available to show a WP:GNG pass. Article reeks of promo/COI. I'm unable to find enough reviews of the books in this series to substantiate any claim at passing WP:NAUTHOR - none on GNews or Google, and only two on Highbeam - which, for a series containing 9 books, isn't much. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete with the comment that "Michael Hansen" is a surprisingly common name. Something on a different chap with this name led me to start sourcing the article. Interviews with Hansen have appeared in the (local) Fort Collins Coloradoan after publication of several of his books. His books are published in paperback by a small house that appears to be a real publisher. At least one was reviewed in a book review the name of which escapes me at the moment bu t that reviews novels form small presses. That's the best I can do, and it's not enough. Always happy to reconsider if someone finds WP:RSs.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 21:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.