The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I would be happy to userfy it to anyone who asks on my talkpage. J04n(talk page) 12:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jilla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At this point, the film fails WP:NFILM, no third party reliable sources indicate the project has entered principal photography stage. PROD was removed without explanation. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy since the film will enter principal photography in a couple of months anyway.^King Jakob _C2 19:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no shooting news. -- Dravidian Hero 19:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per significant coverage. NickCochrane (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point out some actually significant coverage? There are a number of links to gossip and rumors, but no actual coverage. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate or Userfy for a short while. The planned film DOES have coverage in reliable sources, but not nearly enough to qualify as an exception to WP:NFF. Topic is simply TOO SOON for a separate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per Michael. Torreslfchero (talk) 10:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was about to close this as userfy to User:Bothiman/Jilla, but noticed that it's pre-dated by Jilla(2013 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Upon closing this discussion, the article could be redirected to Vijay (actor). Because of the related article, there may be attribution issues which need addressing. -- Trevj (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

for a redirect of a film, wouldnt the logical target be the director rather than one of the stars? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. I was just going on this version. -- Trevj (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wait till it comes out. Even though components may be substantiated too many things can change from start date to release date.Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 20:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Well... to be fair, for pending films that are sourcable but do not quite meet requisites for WP:NF, we do have options other than outright deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.