- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Miss Illinois USA. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 04:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Jill Gulseth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only thing close to being marginally notable for Gulseth is being Miss Illinois USA. However this is not enough to make her notable. The sources are from two extremely local papers, she did not even merit mention in any actual Chicago papers. There are also two sources that are from a publication of her university, but generally university papers are not considered enough to help a student at that university pass GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- If not independently notable, then redirect to Miss Illinois USA as a valid search term. North America1000 06:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The fact that some of these articles have been redirected and not deleted outright for this year is now being used to keep other articles because the redirects make it look like more articles have been deemed notable than has been the case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Possible source here and a quickie mention here and a one paragraph quote here and no doubt she's a beautiful woman but I don't think the sources are sufficient to meet the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Miss Illinois USA. Sources offered by Tomwsulcer are insufficient to meet GNG, and the subject is not notable outside of being a state level winner. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.