The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish defense[edit]

article is origional research and article has no content. Not sure this is even a real concept. Sefringle^Talk 03:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. —Sefringle^Talk 03:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (a) Used in this sense, it appears to be a neologism. Most Google hits for the phrase that don't find the JDL or the JDO seem to be organizations from Mandatory Palestine. (b) Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Delete, unsourced neologism. 6SJ7 16:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move to a disambiguation page, which is what it is. Bearian 16:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Author presupposes that "Jewish Defense is an umbrella term referring to the defense of the Jewish People through any and all means necessary" without any source for that idea. A term has to be well-known for there to be one meaning, let alone an ambiguity. Mandsford 01:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As far as I know (or informed by this article), this is not such a notable, self-standing concept. HG | Talk 18:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Little content and original research.Type 40 16:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.