The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 12:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Levy[edit]

Jerry Levy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article does not currently establish notability of subject; does not appear to to satisfy the suggestions for notability given by WP:PROF or WP:POLITICIAN. While there are some articles mentioning the subject as an also-ran for political office, I do not believe that these references constitute significant media coverage. Qqqqqq (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. The only refence included is to an out of print book from the 70s, which doesn't seem to have made a signifigant impact because it is largely difficult to locate with no independent reviews of the work.Rcurtis5 (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, gnews search "Jerry+Levy"+marlboro&cf=all here shows there are sufficient sources to support a brief article on him. I doubt he meets WP:PROF, but I think he satisfies WP:BIO. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC) okay, why does my attempt to link a search fail to work/display properly? The gnews search is supposed to be: "jerry levy" marlboro, all dates[reply]
• Delete. Insufficient evidence of impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO either.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clear failure of WP:PROF and WP:POLITICIAN. Johnuniq (talk) 09:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Along with WP:PROF and WP:POLITICIAN, the article also fails to convince me that he passes WP:CREATIVE for his role in "Marx in Soho" — the reviews I found for his version of it were all very much small-town press. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.