The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Joelito (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be an advertisement brochure, not an encyclopedia article. Thekohser 04:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 21:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - rm some of the POV material. ---J.S (t|c) 21:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep They seem to be notable enough. GassyGuy 23:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.