The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Izno (talk) 02:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jellyfish search optimizer

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brand new algorithm that was introduced a few months ago and has only been mentioned in two papers by the inventors. Secondary sources have not discussed this algorithm and the papers haven't received citations yet (as far as I can tell). WP:TOOSOON, WP:GNG. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:TOOSOON not yet picked up beyond the original researchers. ~Kvng (talk) 15:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON - this is the right call; if you check article authors, you find the original researchers. -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Zing^(Talk!) 03:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.