The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 16:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jellybass[edit]

Jellybass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom. This article was deleted through the PROD process, but the contents were pasted back in by a contributor. I've restored the history for attribution reasons and am bringing it here for evaluation. The PROD nominator indicated, "No apparent coverage in reliable sources. Nothing in google news on the artist or on the term representing a genre; Allmusic carries a listing but no substantive content." Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and original PROD. Problems with WP:V and WP:N. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C16:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the article makes to significant assertions. One is that jellybass refers to a genre of music. This fails verifiability. I can find no critical commentary about any genre of music known a jellybase. It also asserts that jellybase is a musical group. This fails notability as there are no reliable sources covering this group. -- Whpq (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.