The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jehuty[edit]

Jehuty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - expired prod removed by anon with no explanation. This fictional weapon has no real-world notability and no reliable sources to attest to said notability. The article is also very plot-heavy, raising WP:PLOT concerns. Otto4711 12:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RS. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 16:36, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - wow, that's a lot of information about a mech in a two-game series. I believe we recently deleted a lot of Gundam mechs - this doesn't seem to be even close to the same level as Gundam, so this looks to be too in-depth - plus, it's unsourced and may be original research. A mention on the game's page would be appropriate, I think. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obscure weapons in video games are usually not notable. ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 20:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless reliable sources can be found. Sources like those used in Anubis (Orbital frame) (also on AfD) would help to provide real-world context, but even that's not quite enough. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.