The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Pelehac[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a classic BLP1E, with the event, being recorded dancing, not being particularly notable either. AniMate 13:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – BLP1E certainly applies here, and even that one event was not particularly notable, with little to no coverage in reliable sources. — Quasar G. 13:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only one post 2008 google hit of any particular note - [1] (appears in one of the photos) - which is not much at all.Icewhiz (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above; if he gets to be a general, we can put it back up. --Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 22:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Passing trivia at best and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 21:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like a classic case of BLP1E. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.