The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JavaGB[edit]

JavaGB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable software. Very few Google hits; can't find any independent third-party reviews or other coverage from reliable sources. The software's developer appears to be this article's primary author. Psychonaut (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: advertising made by the developer. Alexius08 (talk) 14:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Seems really uncontroversial given the zero hits in news and books, WP:PROD would have worked. Pcap ping 23:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as non-notable spam/COI --JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 23:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.