The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, taking into account the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainforest Media Server. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Janmedia[edit]

Janmedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable as far as I can tell. Strangely, it seems to have lots of google hits, but scanning the first few pages provides no evidence of notability. -- Mark Chovain 12:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should point out that their web page has lots of flashy graphics and drops some pretty big names, but there seems to be a lack of reliable sources to back it all up. -- Mark Chovain 12:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As Chovain said, there are a lot of g-hits, but most of them look to be internet yellow pages and business reviews. I don't see anything that makes them notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 12:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.