The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jagjit Kaur[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see nothing here that is notable, and the refs are routine listings mere mentions DGG ( talk ) 01:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I see nothing to pass WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Ray^Talk 14:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The references that aren't directory entries are articles about something else that mention the subject only in a trivial way, so there isn't enough evidence of passing WP:GNG, and there also seems to be no sign of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:Notability (people). This seems like another instance of someone really grasping for straws in order to create an article about a non-notable subject. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I also think that notability eludes the subject of this article who fails to meet WP:GNG. Nothing she has done to date makes her stand out in a crowd and the article was created by someone who has made only four edits/contributions, three about her.--Zananiri (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.