The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Kyle Young[edit]

Jacob Kyle Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello. An actor who clearly does not pass WP:NACTOR. As for WP:GNG, sources in the article that are not marked as press releases or so-called "community contributor" pieces appear to be promotional articles in non-RS publications. WP:BEFORE gave me nothing better. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Biwom (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Biwom (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Owlf Which of those sources are reliable, independent, in depth coverage that you think I've "missed"? Praxidicae (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Praxidicae I checked the URL again and find some content are removed and links not working but few I can see here [[1]],[[2]] and as per his IMDB he has played on multiple movies. 13:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Owlf Being in a movie does not make anyone notable, it means they have had several jobs. Being in several films also doesn't make someone notable unless the films are notable and the role is significant. That is not the case here. This is a vanity PR piece and not independent, reliable or in depth and This is basically a business hobby blog and not independent or reliable. Praxidicae (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Barkeep49:, I rod your comment and check some of your claims. But if I want to change my vote it will be merge the article, I looked to article again and saw the actor played a new role in a 2019 movie (and had played many roles before). It's can keep by merging but deleting whole article is not the best option.Forest90 (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Forest90 To which article are you proposing it is merged to? Praxidicae (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.