- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Ixitxachitl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional creature. Every source being used is primary, aside from one youtube video which, for obvious reasons, is not a reliable source. There is no significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that would indicate any sort of notability for the monster. Rorshacma (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability in secondary sources. Non-notable pure gamecruft.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. No real world notability. A redirect to the list would be okay, but it looks like that list might not survive it's own AfD.Onel5969 TT me 14:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.