The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Italophilia. Sandstein 10:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Italophile[edit]

Italophile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rather baffling content fork of Italophilia. Should be turned into a redirect to same. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom. The only additional content is the "post 1945" section which is of dubious quality and sourcing. The rest is basically a summary of the other page. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Italophilia, content fork. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.