The result was nomination withdrawn. Shrike (talk) 11:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)(non admin closure)[reply]
Most of the article relies on primary source(the organisation website).And it reads now like campaign leaflet of this organisation.Though organisation is sometime mentioned in secondary sources its very scarce usually one or two sentences.I propose to merge what is salvageable to House demolition in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Shrike (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't think the WP:BEFORE process has been followed. Google books[1], Google scholar[2], Google news[3]. There are a very large number of sources out there. Sean.hoyland - talk 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-
This isn't an exhaustive list, there are countless RS reports on this organisation. Most of them are breif mentions, but there are also occasionally more detailed coverage which easily meets notability requirements. The article certainly needs work, but that is a separate issue to saying that an article is not merited on notability grounds. Dlv999 (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]