The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ismael Ogando[edit]

Ismael Ogando (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for notability, Fails WP:CREATIVE ,WP:GNG. Probably a Self-promotion exercise. Razer^Talk 13:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment No comments on the self-promotion bit. Whatever I've read of the subject points to his being quite talented and one who has performed internationally. He's also the editor-in-chief of the Ground magazine.[1][2]. So am unsure. Lourdes 15:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Note that the article about GROUND magazine is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GROUND. (No opinion on either myself.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I have just removed two "references", neither of which (links to Kulturstiftung des Bundes, the German Federal Cultural Foundation and to Wikileaks) make any reference whatsoever to the biographee. I have just added a Notability tag on the corresponding article at es:wp and am checking other, related articles created in Spanish. --Technopat (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, they created both pages. then tagged the first one GROUND Magazine for speedy deletion, immediately they created the right one, this was a faster way to change article's name following Wikipedia's suggestion. The tag on the current page GROUND seem a bit fishy since one minute after also the author Ismael Ogando who is tagged in GROUND is also marked for deletion very recently, almost a minute after they tagged GROUND, it seems an action with bad intentions, likely happened with the wikicommon images which are placed with consent of the author and were deliberately deleted! also an article from 5 years ago was tagged as irrelevant for the encyclopedia. This is clearly an act of vandals, since the author tagged target is currently alive and at risk of political persecution. Lets not get dramatic and paranoid. But clearly there was a serious intent to damage and erase this author's work, therefore this is an action of #Vandalism.2A06:8781:0:305:254B:4F73:48DA:16C4 (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia with articles about notable subjects, not free web space for creating notability. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 16:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, per Thomas.W's --Discasto (talk) 08:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothings shows he passes WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.