The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irritant Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic (currently unsourced) lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a music reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 03:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar 03:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this suggests better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can only find primary sources, not any reliable independent sources to establish notability. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 06:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found a book source from 2003 but it only mentions the name with the release of an album. Nothing on Newspapers.com and Google News turns up nothing. Fails WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has two notable artists, but one of those was only a 12-inch single (Captain Ahab), and the other (Jason Forrest) released a singular album on the label. If the claims of the article could be verified, I'd !vote weak keep because the operations of the label would bring value to understanding the genre, but as noted above there are no sources (and I could not find any either) that verifies any useful information about the label, therefore more than failing GNG guideline, it fails the more important policy WP:V. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.