The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 02:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ipernity[edit]

Obvious marketing attempt, but not sure if its blatant enough for WP:CSD#G11.

This single purpose account has also went and added link to Ipernity on many related articles in a clear attempt at advertising that website. Could be also a conflict of interest. Also, there are no hits on either Google News or Google Scholars nor are there any references in the article itself so verifiability is a problem as well. I am aware that this is a pretty new article but this looks too much like an advertisement to let it sit until reliable references can be found (which I doubt is possible) --Shinhan 12:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. YechielMan 13:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No showing of notability of this website or business is made in the article. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- per all of the above. Eddie 16:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: poorly constructed collection of non-notable bulleted lists. --Nonstopdrivel 18:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CSD#A7 is probably more befitting, although the service has some novelty it does not deserve a separate article, at least until it can be cited, until then a mention in a new section I'm going to add to the Photo_sharing article should suffice. Verseguru 15:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.