The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G11 by User:Jimfbleak. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ioner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subsidiary and non-notable company. None of the references in the Ioner article even so much as mention the word, and both articles appear to have been created by an SPA. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - could have been speedied, IMHO. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note the article creator has been blocked as a spammer. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 23:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.