The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Relations Quarterly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no independent sources that might demonstrate the notability of this entity. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (converse) @ 22:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (chat) @ 22:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independent sources, not listed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see this journal listed in selective databases; no coverage from independent sources; nothing to indicate this meets the criteria for WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.