The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Copyvio of http://www.publishersglobal.com/directory/publisher.asp?publisherid=19608 Ged UK 21:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inter-India Publications[edit]

Company does not appear to meet notability standards. No references at all (tagged for seven months). Google hits are apparently only in bibliography entries or articles that are exact or near copies of this article. No articles from independent sources found about the company. (Contested speedy and prod.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry about that. Twinkle does that sometimes. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely unnecessary page, seems to just be a vanity article. Completely unsourced and not notable. Parkerparked (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete G12 tagged as such. Also, NN company, and the claim is a bit absurd - one of the oldest publishers in India, and in existence for 30 years. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.