The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was prodded in 2010 but prod was removed. This bill got scant attention in technology circles, but does not appear to have even made it to a committee vote, let alone get to the floor of any chamber of the United States government. As the bill was proposed over 8 years ago, it is no longer pending or relevant, and there is no obvious place to merge the minimal relevant information in the article (an article that reads more like a term paper on intellectual property and law than an encyclopedia article on the topic). For those reasons, deletion seems to be the most prudent option. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like a pile of OR. Most of the citations appear to be describing the specific things the article claims are linked to its subject, rather than actually making that link. In fact as far as I can tell only one of the references is actually about the article topic, and that's a link to the bill itself, hardly a reliable source for asserting notability. —Nizolan ^(talk) 10:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = proposed bills that do not leave committee are rarely notable, and run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 03:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.