The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:23, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inspired Leadership Award[edit]

Inspired Leadership Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This award is of questionable notability itself and appears to have been created by SPAs to prop up corporate bios on Wikipedia. We've had this discussion with other awards before (New Talent Awards, Bharat Gaurav Award, Golden Book of World Records, etc.) and have nearly come to consensus that awards need extraordinary media coverage to be considered notable. Regardless, the article presents zero independent references. Brianhe (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - what is the sound of one hand clapping? This award, by a non-notable theatre group to business people, is so minor as in effect to be half-hearted applause. I'm afraid it might be an effort to gain donations by a minor, yet worthy, charity from wealthy businesses. However, I remind the gentle reader that we are not a web host for other charities; rather, we are a private charity that has to seek our own donations. Nobody would allow a theater group to insist on free Girl Scout Cookies for actors. Bearian (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- the awarding org is non notable itself, so it's unclear how the award can be notable. Notability is not inherited from notable recipients. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.