The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 10:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian British[edit]

Indonesian British (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Following the previous trainwreck mass-nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan British, I've been trying to consider the huge number of unsourced human migration articles individually (it's not just the ones about Britain; other editors have created an equally huge number of articles about immigrants in Latin America). This one appears unsalvageable; I can't find any reliable sources which discuss the topic non-trivially. The BBC's Born Abroad section, covering near 50 countries which supply migrants to the UK, doesn't have a separate page for Indonesians. Also tried the usual combination of search terms on google, in both English and Indonesian, like:

Furthermore, all the statements in this article which might represent a claim to notability appear to be false. Per the OECD table cited, the UK has only about 6,000 Indonesian-born foreigners living within its borders, not 20,000 as this article claims, and the Indonesians fleeing from Suharto mostly went to the Netherlands (the former colonial power), not the UK. And of course, the title is a neologism. cab (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.