The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Hoax article, been around for 16 years without any sort of sources or anything else; BEFORE only pulls up mirrors or copypastas of this page and no news hits what-so-ever (string: "Indigo Muldoon"). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete. As I mentioned on its talk page, additions to actual article content come from two single-purpose accounts, Moore575 and 24.118.236.102. Searching on google prior to January 1, 2008 for "Indigo Heat" yields only unrelated results, and "Indigo Muldoon" only produces the article in question. This definitely seems like a hoax to me, or at the very least it falls far from meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines. aismallard (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete. Same reasoning as above, almost no mention of it anywhere on the greater web. Tux9001 (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete. As per above. Article does not cite any sources, and a search on the web too does not show any related material. Kpddg (talk • contribs) 02:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment: While this is probably a hoax, if it weren't a hoax the article should have been about Indigo Heat, the graphic novel, not Indigo Muldoon, the character. Gildir (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete, then add to the Wikipedia:List of hoaxes, 16 years earns it a prominent place. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete and move to hoaxes per above. "Gitchi Manito" seems to be a diety in Ojibwe tradition and "El Shaddih" may be El Shaddai, so I suspect it was written with a hodge-prodge of various spiritual traditions. MSG17 (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete Good job for discovering this hoax. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete For previously stated reasons, this is almost certainly a hoax. It should probably go to the hoax museum. CJ-Moki (talk) 21:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete, per my arguments on the original talk page. No citations, all mentions outside of this character appear to be clones from across the web, and even if it's not a hoax, it's surely not notable enough to earn a page. CompliensCreator (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete, don't think there's much to say that hasn't already been said. Good job spotting this. QoopyQoopy (talk) 14:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete and add to list of hoaxes as per above. Shocked this lasted so long. Gabe114 (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)