The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Win Development[edit]

In Win Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article for non notable firm. It's written essentially the same as one would write a catalog page for the firm. It's been here since 2010! DGG ( talk ) 01:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only non-corporate non-shopping sources I could find have to deal with their stock price, which would require a lot of original research to flesh out even a stub with. --John M Wolfson (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.