The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imag091307[edit]

Imag091307 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contrary to a talk-page claim, there's no evidence this is a notable worm/virus. Ghits are limited to discussion of it, without any RS coverage to determine notability. StarM 03:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 03:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - again, wikipedia doesn't exist for the purpose of documenting every virus. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Even if this exists, it's not prolific enough to be WP:N. DARTH PANDA^duel 00:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A non-notable virus. Schuym1 (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I call hoax. This may be jsut an arbitrary filename, and the link in the article points out an IRC worm that doesn't appear to be relevant. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral comment. It does appear to be real but mainly restricted to China [1][2][3]. This makes it difficult to verify notability but we need to avoid systematic bias. McWomble (talk) 06:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not notable. Wikipedia is not an anti-virus guide. JohnCD (talk) 12:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• No one said it was. Please focus your comment on the merits, or lack thereof in the article at hand. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.