The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ido Abram[edit]

Ido Abram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable, no real references Ziggy Sawdust (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable for writings on Judaism and indentity. Of course hes not a pokemon so lets delete him.... Francium12 (talk) 19:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It needs a lot of work with sources and such, but it is not an unsalvageable or completely non-notable article. RedZion^X 20:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Could use some work, but is notable. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable individual. See [1], [2] and [3] - (Mind meal (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
• Keep, not 100% sure all of the information is about him, but I found some coverage of his writings related to Judaism. Travellingcari (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It was probably a mistake to nominate this article. Now that I look at it more closely, I can see that I was in error. Ziggy Sawdust (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.