The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland at the 2015 Games of the Small States of Europe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No content besides saying the country competed at the event (which can be found on the main article). Also the page is unreferenced. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the following for the same reasons:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Articles serve no purpose other than redirecting to sports results. Ajf773 (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just because an article is almost empty does not mean that it can't or won't be expanded.--Snaevar (talk) 12:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Snaevar (talk) 18:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep and improve the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rody19901504 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agree with nominator. This information can all be found at the main page for the event by year, there is no need to have separate articles for each country each year. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

comment: @PMC: I am fine with you voting delete but you are making false claims here. In the time between the nomination of the Icelandic article until you voted the Icelandic article has specified 15 medallists. The claims the nominator made are now incorrect and your comment of all the information being available on the main page is completely false.--Snaevar (talk) 00:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to slightly re-word: "This information ~~can~~ should all be found at the main page for the event by year, there is no need to have separate articles for each country each year." Seriously, we're hosting all this information three times - at the main games by year article, at the country by year article, and at the sport by year article. And then lather rinse repeat for every year the games occur? Totally not necessary. There's gotta be a clean way to do this all in one article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all – pointless articles; nothing but an unseemly list of redirects. Laurdecl ^talk 09:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Article is basically a link farm with a 2-sentence Lead. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.