The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:V; remains unsourced even afer the AfD.  Sandstein  06:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hykko[edit]

Hykko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Besides which this is an obscure word in either Finnish or German (the article is not clear) which hardly seems to be used anymore. Jaque Hammer (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• move to wiktionary 184.144.163.241 (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not because it violates WP:DICT (it doesn't) but because it's completely unsourced and violates WP:Verifiability. Searching Google Books for this term revealed nothing useful, so unless reliable sources get added, we have no way of knowing that this isn't a hoax. —Angr (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.